Skip to main content
Wikispaces Classroom is now free, social, and easier than ever.
Try it today.
Pages and Files
About this Wiki
HIPE video tutorials
HIPE on Twitter
Contributing to HIPE
Back to HSC homepage
PACS Photometry Data Processing Webinar 3
22 November 2012, 15:00 CET
Chair: Bruno Altieri (HSC)
Present: Bruno Altieri, David Atlee, Jacopo Fritz, Jean Matagne, Paola Andreani, Bruno Merín, Alvaro Ribas, marcio
Total: 8, 5 external
Presentations and demos at
PACS photometry webinar presentation
PACS photometry webinar video tutorial
Questions and Answers
Demos run with HIPE 10.
Q-Jacopo Fritz: Is the high pass filter technical note just posted on the PACS twiki page the same that as been submitted to astro-ph yesterday?
A: yes, exactly the same.
Q-Jacopo Fritz: Can you also process sub-area maps with mad map?
A: currently not, because of the nature of the mad map processing philosophy.
Q-Jacopo Fritz: At this point should we already use HIPE 10?
A: no, the new version will be publicly available in December and only the deconvolution plugin only works in HIPE 10 but the rest should run in HIPE 9 equally well.
Q-AlvaroRibas: the PSF in the scanamorphos maps is not very stable, so which method would be better to use to extract the point sources? The suss extractor needs the beam area for 60 arcsec/sec parallel mode maps, which is not easy. For the aperture photometry I do also not know which aperture corrections to use because when combining both scan and cross-scan maps they look like a cross.
A: We have not really characterized the EEF for fast scan maps.
Q-Alvaro Ribas: Sussectractor fluxes are 0.6 x the aperture photometry fluxes. The FWHM would be 10 arc sec, while using standard PSFs, the numbers are not consistent within the quoted errors.
A: I would rely better on aperture photometry which guarantees that you would get all the flux. In general the largest value tends to be the most correct.
A: Send me one of those maps to study it with the photometer experts. It is a difficult issue.
BA: potential future improvements:
- The focal plane and field distortion in PACS could have changed with time and re-calibrating it would then improve the PSF, which then would translate to more accurate photometry.
- The knowledge on the actual pointing accuracy is being improved in parallel, which will translate to better resolution in the 70 and 100 micron fluxes.
Basic principles of PACS photometer data reduction
Latest mapping possibilities inside and outside HIPE
Convolving PACS and SPIRE maps
Point source extraction in HIPE, fluxes, errors and upper limits
Questions and Answers
Webinar Material (demo scripts and presentation)
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"